Below is the first of the class response papers written by our students about what they have learned about British Counterinsurgency. Today's writing prompt:
As a red-blooded American, there are few things I hold as sacred as Independence Day, the anniversary of the Greatest Divorce Paper of all time. Today is rather ironic for me, as this year I am celebrating July Fourth in the Mother Country of England while studying abroad. So, there is no better way to continue this theme than by playing devil’s advocate and brainstorming just what the British Empire could have done to retain the American Colonies back in 1775-1783. I believe the two main changes the British should have made to keep the colony were:
What should the British have done differently in order to win the American Revolution? Focus on 2 things.Enjoy!
As a red-blooded American, there are few things I hold as sacred as Independence Day, the anniversary of the Greatest Divorce Paper of all time. Today is rather ironic for me, as this year I am celebrating July Fourth in the Mother Country of England while studying abroad. So, there is no better way to continue this theme than by playing devil’s advocate and brainstorming just what the British Empire could have done to retain the American Colonies back in 1775-1783. I believe the two main changes the British should have made to keep the colony were:
- Run a strong propaganda campaign to generate greater public support for the war within Great Britain.
- Choose stronger leadership and promote better communication between British officials coordinating the war efforts.
![]() |
Figure
1.- Franklin, B. (1754) Join or Die [Online
image].
Retrieved July 4, 2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Join,_or_Die |
Creating a more positive perception of the war against America would
have improved the British people’s “will to win”. This would make the cost in
lives and money spent much more acceptable to the British people. The British
had the resources to continue the war even after the Battle of Yorktown, so
with popular support they may have kept fighting long after they eventually
surrendered.
![]() |
Figure
2. – Soldi, A. (1762-1765) Portrait of
General Clinton
[Online image]. Retrieved July 4, 2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Clinton_ (British_Army_officer,_born_1730) |
By observing the successful British counterinsurgency attempt in the
Malayan
Emergency, one can see that the British should have reorganized their
leadership when it stopped being effective. The Malayan Emergency “illustrates
superbly the value of energy and charisma in winning support from both
government personnel and the population at large.”2
While it is true that the British could have tremendously improved
their war effort, I think many Americans and Britons alike are thankful they
did not. After all, both countries have done splendidly on their own and we have
hamburgers, country music, and iPhones as a result of this particular divorce.
So, to my Americans back home, eat some watermelon and light some fireworks for
me. Happy Independence Day, friends!
1 Boot, Max. 2013. Invisible Armies: An Epic History of Guerrilla Warfare From Ancient Times to the Present. New York: Liveright Publishing. Chapter 14: The American Hornets. ↩
2 Moyar, Mark. 2009. A Question of Command: Counterinsurgency from the Civil War to Iraq. New Haven: Yale University Press. Chapter 6: The Malayan Emergency.↩
No comments:
Post a Comment